were you aware that carey mulligan’s oscar dress was covered in utensils?
Anonymous asked: For the people who can't afford expensive shoes, I think $80 is reasonable for something name brand and flashy. Target is doing the same thing. Don't knock people who can't afford expensive fashion, $80 is still too much for me and I look fashionable. It's easy to look fashionable when you're rich, I would like to see you try it on a budget.
i think you misunderstood the meaning in my 48 words. before jumping to snark, you should know that i live on a budget, anonymous. my life is one large budget, but aside from that, my point [however vague] was that i find it silly to spend $80 on a pair of mass-produced, poorly-designed heels when you can go to a marshall’s or dsw and buy the product of a respected brand made with quality materials for half the price. payless shoes are notoriously cheap in construct and are known to fall apart after only a few wears.
side note: i have never spent more than $60 on footwear.
style is wearing an evening dress to mcdonald’s, wearing heels to play football. it is personality, confidence and seduction.
at first, i thought that the individual pieces forming this outfit were a bit much when combined. a second glance proved that a mish-mash of textures is irrelevant when worn properly, similar to layering. as long as it isn’t an over-sized, ill-fitting mess of clothing, pile ‘em on! the more, the merrier!
the newest christian siriano for payless collection for spring 2010 may now be available, but do they really think that i would spend $80 on a pair of [most likely] poor quality, mass-produced heels? hot tranny mess, please.
one of my closest friends is in this month’s issue of lucky (jessica szohr is on the cover). turn to page 84 and peep the long-legged brunette on the right.
with knee surgery on the horizon, chances are slim that i’ll be taking these slippers off. yes, they are covered in dinosaurs. yes, i’m single. call me?




while i’m on the topic, shielding your eyes is super important and sunglasses are an accessory that everyone owns. price-points for the piece can range from dirt-cheap to indulgent. super just revealed its latest collection, the “w”, a collaboration with zeiss to create an extremely powerful protective lens.
i am loving the red pair. interested? they’re available for $167 each.
i may already have a banging pair of glasses, but i am always looking (get it? looking? my mom says i’m funny.) for new pairs. this morning, i stumbled upon warby parker’s selection of “anti-reflective, polycarbonate prescription lenses.” but who cares about the technicalities? listen up: every pair is only $95.
the company website also gives customers a virtual test-drive via photo upload or having up to 5 pairs mailed to your home. even better? a pair is donated to a member of an impoverished community for every one that is purchased.

hi, i'm sara.
farpitzs means "all dressed up" in yiddish.
e-mail me: sarazucker@gmail.com
got a question? ask it.
i have a twitter.
i write for brandchannel.
i write for only denim.
i write for couture cult.
i write for blackbook.
i write for mediaite.
i've written for styld.
i've written for fashion week daily.
lemondrop loves me.
pronto loves me.
fashion indie loves me.
coutorture loves me.